The Fed Goes Political

by Country Thinker | March 1st, 2012

Thoughts on Economics

Last year I wrote that the Fed’s var­i­ous quan­ti­ta­tive eas­ing pro­grams had put our nation’s cen­tral bank between a rock and a hard place. George Mel­loan had an edi­to­r­ial Mon­day that echoed many of the same sen­ti­ments, as well as adding a few addi­tional obser­va­tions that sug­gest the Fed is becom­ing increas­ingly politicized.

The rock and a hard place is this: To cre­ate the new “money” in the econ­omy (the “eas­ing”), the Fed has been buy­ing up large quan­ti­ties of U.S. Trea­suries. I pic­ture it this way. Imag­ine the Fed has a closet full of money. When they want to increase the money sup­ply, they pull money out of the closet, and trade it for Trea­suries. This tends to make the inter­est rate on Trea­suries go down, because there are more buy­ers in the mar­ket fight­ing for the Treasuries.

But when infla­tion begins to heat up, the Fed needs to “mop up” the excess liq­uid­ity. They do this by revers­ing the process, pulling the Trea­suries out of the closet, trad­ing them for dol­lars, and then putting the dol­lars back into the closet. This tends to make inter­est rates rise as the num­ber of Trea­sury sell­ers goes up and the num­ber of buy­ers goes down.

So, if the econ­omy heats up, the Fed is going to have to start dump­ing its Trea­sury hold­ings to keep infla­tion down. That means that our debt ser­vice costs will rise, at a time when debt ser­vice is already pro­jected to be the fastest grow­ing cat­e­gory of fed­eral spend­ing. In other words, the Fed may have to choose between infla­tion and blow­ing a hole in the already dan­ger­ous deficit.

Mel­loan called the Fed “the hand­maiden of the White House and Con­gress,” and there are two parts of that com­ment that relate to the rock-​​and-​​a-​​hard-​​place prob­lem I laid out above.

First, the Fed has held inter­est rates at zero or near zero for years, and will do so for at least two more. This has kept inter­est rates on gov­ern­ment debt low, but it has also arti­fi­cially depressed earn­ings on a lot of safe invest­ments such as CDs. Charles Schwab has been rant­ing about this prob­lem for the last few years, as many of his con­ser­v­a­tive investors—particularly seniors who are try­ing to pro­tect their retirement—are the ones feel­ing the pain of arti­fi­cially low returns.

Because the effect of the Fed’s inter­est rate poli­cies has been to lower the deficit on the backs of retirees. You can think of it as a stealth tax on grandparents.

Sec­ond, Mel­loan notes that the pro­posed Vol­cker Rule (a spawn of Dodd-​​Frank) has adopted the Basel II cap­i­tal require­ments, in which Trea­suries are rated as zero risk. So banks are being incen­tivized to retain large hold­ings of Trea­suries to lower their “risk expo­sure” instead of mak­ing busi­ness loans. As Euro­pean banks found out with their Greek debt hold­ings, sov­er­eign debt isn’t nec­es­sar­ily risk-​​free even if reg­u­la­tors rate it that way.

So all and all, the Fed is increas­ingly becom­ing a polit­i­cal ser­vant, and its poli­cies are tai­lored more and more for the ben­e­fit of the fed­eral gov­ern­ment. If this trend holds, you can expect high infla­tion before the Fed will clear its bal­ance sheet if the Fed has to choose between infla­tion and higher debt ser­vice costs.

LinkedInStumbleUponShare

11 Responses to “The Fed Goes Political”

  1. John Galt says:

    Again, ESP at work. Just yes­ter­day I made the com­ment to Jim, of Con­ser­v­a­tives On Fire, that “the Fed has become politi­cized” and is fre­quently doing the WH’s bid.

    Basi­cally, the Fed’s dou­ble mis­sion of sta­ble prices and low unem­ploy­ment are fre­quently at odds with each other, and at odds with the elec­tion prospects of its cur­rent mas­ters.
    John Galt recently posted..We Are Los­ing Our Free­dom … And Our Wallets.

  2. Noth­ing is more Amer­i­can than a pri­vate cen­tral bank, which is con­trolled by a Euro­pean cen­tral bank using it’s money to influ­ence our gov­ern­ment.
    Trestin recently posted..Barack Obama

  3. Jim at Conservatives on Fire says:

    I like your lady Fed Chair­man in “The Egal has Crashed” much bet­ter than Bernanke.

  4. SilverfiddleNo Gravatar says:

    You explained that very well, Ted. We are screwed…
    Sil­ver­fid­dle recently posted..Andrew Bre­it­bart, RIP

  5. You bring up a good point that I always miss when harp­ing on these things even though it should be obvi­ous to me. Which is that, besides the obvi­ous prob­lems of money print­ing, by arti­fi­cially push­ing inter­est rates down, the Fed arti­fi­cially reduces retiree incomes (thanks to the lower rate of return). So not only are they forced to pay more dol­lars for what they need, they end up doing so on less dol­lars com­ing in. Talk about screw­ing retirees over.

    Fed Chair under Nixon, Arthur F. Burns, summed up the Fed’s rela­tion with pol­i­tics in one sen­tence: “If the Fed doesn’t do what the pres­i­dent wants, it would lose its inde­pen­dence.“
    theCL recently posted..Tim­o­thy Gei­th­ner Sub­poena: May Face Crim­i­nal Charges

Leave a Reply

CommentLuv badge

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.

About This Site

Ted Lacksonen is a writer, and these are his reflections on important issues confronting America from a forest-from-the-trees Country Class perspective. He is the author of the novel The Eagle Has Crashed.

The focus of this site is Polawnics—the interrelated areas of Politics, Law, and Economics (see above for more details). To present a balance, articles appear based on the schedule to the right.

Home


Back to Most Recent

Categories

Book Trailer

Click on YouTube to watch it there, or press the "Full Screen" button for a larger screen. (Use the ESC button to return to normal size.)

Archives

Blogroll

Links